Saturday, March 27, 2010

Herpes Simplex Virus 2 Vaccine 2010

teachers - Authorities bullying victims


Since 1984, H. was employed as a teacher's employer Basel-Stadt. Of this, he taught about 10 years Brunnmatt at the school orientation. H. 2005 was given to Gaby Jenö a new boss, who was also a teacher and school leader at the OS Brunnmatt and H. teachers had over the years numerous disagreements. Within a year, took all the new Rector to urge teachers cent of the teaching profession. It used the unclear formulated articles of the new Personnel Act and constructed from a spiral of escalation intent to drive H. teachers with intent to unemployment. Your sneaky approach can only be described as "bullying" or "Bossing". Unfortunately, the chase of Teachers H. from the current Head of Education Hans-Georg Signer (SP), the head of the Department of Education Dr. Christoph Eymann (LDP and the Court President of the Court of Appeal and the Administrative Court, Dr. Marie-Louise Master (LDP) was vigorously supported.
starting point for the witch hunt against teachers were three H. completely groundless complaints of three left-feminist mothers. These complaints took Jeno RELIED excuse to H. about the medical officer to engage in a psychiatric procedure. Even in the summer 2006 she placed freely H., on the grounds that he had a mental illness and was a danger to himself and his environment. The personnel manager schools Baerlocher Thomas urged the guardianship authority of the municipality of H. even to have to against a teacher in a so-called custodial care Homer (FFE). As H. found out, he was so shocked that he was writing to the medical officer logged off. Then asked the medical officer Dr. Marc Meier at the urging of Jeno, Baerlocher and Eymann of the cantonal guardianship authority BL the disposal of a FFE. The H. was at home visiting emergency but not a psychiatrist FFE have, because H. despite incredible provocation was always correct and courteous. Shortly after the interview was H. unexpectedly attacked by the special unit of the Kapo BL "Barracuda" and ended up in remand prison Waaghof Basel, where he was locked in a monitoring cell 24 hours. Jeno H. had the day before the public prosecutor appears illegal, claiming that H. had sent Drohmails and Günter Tschanun compared. This infamous lie was supported later by the SHL Brunnmatt and the Head of the School Psychological Service, Dr. Peter Gutzwiller two ordered letters. The fact is that H. intent of all parties always provoked and was ignored and that certain state officials maliciously a climate of fear generated by H. unlawfully removed with precautionary measures from the hospital. The escalation cascade that H. was forced during his summer vacation in 2006 was, apparently as a "self-fulfilling prophecy" has been planned. This did not, however, since S. snaps never and always acted correctly. The warnings from H. to school management and school management to file a claim and to publish the entire history of bullying, H. brought up a defamatory article in the two local newspapers. As "threatened teachers authorities" in the text titled Baslerstab and because as a "teacher Threats exempt "put up BaZ article featured H. unlawfully in reputational way related to the pillory. Shortly H. received from the Dean of the dismissal on the grounds that he had a" committed serious misconduct "because he appointment with the medical officer have not noticed. The letters of many parents, the H. estimated as a committed and competent teachers were very, of the school management, Jeno Rector, head of Signer and ED chief Eymann intentionally ignored consistently. With his attorney, Dr. Rolf Jucker H. presented at the Personnel Appeals Board (PRK) an appeal against his dismissal, but without success. PRK, chaired by Gabrielle Kremo followed the reasoning the ED in all respects. That H. in the class in which he was the class teacher, had a very good relationship with all children and parents interested in the PRK in the slightest. Two complaints were written by H. and Eymann abgeschmettert of Signer on all points. The private action for defamation, the H had brought against his boss, was prejudiced by the court president lic. iur. Marc Oser abgeschmettert arbitrary. The judge twisted the facts and claimed that teachers had compared with H. Günther Tschanun. That in fact has made this comparison with Gaby Jeno their criminal complaint for alleged threat, the Basel criminal court covered up by all means. All the evidence, witnesses and issues Gaby Jeno had a massive impact, were Chief Justice of lic. iur. Marc Oser denied intentionally. The highlight of the trial was conducted entirely at random, the victims of bullying teachers H. prejudiced by the court president to assume the legal fees of the other party in the amount of CHF 8685.50 convicted. It is unbelievable that in this "legal system" that has severely injured in his honor victims of bullying at the end and still pay all the costs.

By order of the criminal proceedings against H. 23/03/2007, for alleged threat by the prosecutor of Basel-City has been set. As compensation for the incredible stress was silly H. Fri 1200th - the state as compensation. After all, the prosecution noted that teachers had been violated H. heavily in his personality:

"In the present case, however, can not be overlooked that due to the media interest in your" case "in perhaps a greater extent in their personal circumstances been affected than others, which are otherwise involved with no result in a prosecution. In addition, also provide the circumstances of your detention, and certainly in related rumors in your neighborhood a drastic effect on your mental integrity dar. therefore appears the alignment of an additional satisfaction because the specific initial position as justified. "

Signer and Eymann asked the parents, the" bullying allegations "by H. teachers not to believe. The numerous false statements by Dr. Christoph Eymann and his supposedly" troubled "telephone call with the director of health services Dr. Andreas Faller suggest that the dismissal of the teacher H. has been planned by the top. The inspection of the OS has done in the two years prior to the dismissal of a single teacher H. hours visit. Also a performance appraisal (MAG) with H. teachers never took place. Nevertheless, President Peter Gross inspection of both the exemption and the notice available grants, contact without H. advance. Obviously, through the OS no longer members of the inspection visits to schools, but parents selectively unprofessional female speakers, whose denunciations of the SHL and the SL and without filters are taken "seriously". This makes it possible to fill the personnel file of unpopular teachers with negative material without the SHL, the SL or inspection should carry out hours. Competent and committed teachers that do not show "uncritical subservient mentality" to be driven by all means to "burn out" or the "dismissal". Those who still have sufficient resources and has dared to express their criticism of the system will take the precaution § 25 of the Personnel Act free. In its ruling of 18:12:07, the administrative court has ruled that the termination was possessed by the OS Rectorate unlawful. Nevertheless, the teacher could not continue working. With three other threats H. termination was forced by his boss Gary Jeno, to be examined by the IV-expert Dr. Daniel Fasnacht. In addition alleged Jeno seriously, that of H. allegedly placed on the internet facts are defamatory to the employer Basel-Stadt. The opposite is the case. The criminal actions of the various state officials to damage the reputation of the canton of Basel-Stadt! Bullying can be tolerated in the cantonal administration, under any circumstances! The study has Ulich clearly shown that one third of the Basel teachers burn out and is at risk from the manager "not taken seriously" feel. The body set up by Dr. Christoph Eymann 'counseling center for teachers "does not alter this fact. The concerns and needs of teachers at all interested in the education bureaucrats, not in reality. Who does not spurt is being bullied, with psychologists and psychiatrists from the system. H. What has experienced in recent years is absolutely incredible. The practice of Rector Gaby Jeno and personnel manager Thomas Baerlocher have violated the personal integrity of teachers and H. massively traumatized. The way in which Head Hans Georg Signer and Department Head Dr. Christoph Eymann manipulate language by teachers and parents intentionally and the head of school psychological services, Dr. Peter Gutzwiller has intentionally abused the trust of coach as so-called H, is completely unacceptable. The permanent provocation designed spiral of escalation, should have been transformed by H. FFE in a mentally ill patient. The teachers have during his vacation H. imposed psychiatrization, criminalization and subsequent scandal in the Basler Zeitung H. driven into unemployment and to the edge of his existence. H. teachers, both when the GPK, the ombudsman, and in the counseling service asked for help. Support was extremely modest. January Goepfert referred by the GPK H. teachers to the ombudsman. Beatrice Ingle-Buomberger did not even know of the ombudsman's office that the cancellation of a medical examination as a "grave breach" an Event of Default is and Corinne Panchaud of the counseling service, by teacher H. Although about two-hour phone conversation, was surprisingly the concluded that the fraudulent actions of OS Rector Gaby Jeno was no bullying. Also, the first prosecutor Thomas Hug saw no evidence of crimes of abuse, coercion, false accusation, misrepresentation or defamation of justice. After all, the Administrative Court in its ruling of 18:12:07 clearly stated:

"In summary, that the notice has been wrongly, the appeal must therefore approve of and the decision of the Personnel Appeals Board is repealed, the method is according to § 40 para 4 PG for free.. the outcome of the trial is to be determined according to the recurrent one party compensation to align. "

Unfortunately the verdict of the Administrative Court also not beyond doubt. In the ten-page letter, the court glossed over under the chairmanship of Dr. Marie-Louise stem the intriguing action of Rector Gaby Jenö as "defects of shape". Teachers would not H. filed within 10 days appeal against unlawful dismissal, he would be forever rid of his job. The Administrative Court will recognize these clear facts, despite no evidence of bullying.

has meanwhile denounced the rector Gaby Jeno respectable teacher again. This time it should be a "serious breach" that the perfectly healthy and able-bodied do not have of H. IV-psychiatrist Dr. Daniel Fasnacht can evaluate. Of course, H. appeals against the second dismissal. Once again, this time the Personnel Appeals Board was chaired by Dr. Christoph Meyer in all aspects of the legal representative of the Department of Education. The Appeals Chamber of the Basel Criminal Court under the chairmanship of lic. iur. Liselotte Henz wanted to recognize the fraudulent events of the various state officials no criminal acts. Unfortunately, there is now also on 15.10.09, the Administrative Court under the chairmanship of Dr. Marie-Louise master of the absurd argument of the appointing authority and the Personnel Appeals Board connected. Although teachers let H. investigate medical office on the instructions of the appointing authority, even by the Basel FFE specialist Dr. Eric Odenheim, and could see no signs of this disease, asked Gaby Jenö a psychiatric assessment at additional IV-psychiatrist Dr. Daniel Fasnacht. As the teacher, this new assault would not have fallen, He was a second time for alleged "serious breach" fired.

Administrative Court President Dr. Marie-Louise Master (LDP), which had mustered in the first trial three police officers searching the complete integrity teacher in vain for weapons involved, the second trial again policemen who explicitly had orders to transfer the teacher If this at all if the verdict "disengage" would. Obviously, the Administrative Court president knew in advance that its decision in H. teachers would not meet with enthusiasm. Although H. teachers had undergone quite correctly dictated the illegal medical examination, supported the administrative court to re unfair dismissal. It seems that Dr. Marie-Louise master their comrades Dr. Christoph Eymann did not want to fall in the back as she announced that the completely healthy H. teachers with the denial of the psychiatric assessment IV alleged a "serious breach of duty" have been involved in should. This highly questionable interpretation of the Basel Personnel Act, the Administrative Court, the transfer of competence of the appointing authority in a wholly unacceptable scale has expanded massively. Because of this indefensible decision, the appointing authority now has the authority to exempt employees without notice uncomfortable and forced into a psychiatric assessment from action. Each non-employee on sick leave, that takes its basic constitutional positions and refusing to transfer to compulsory psychiatric assessment is catapulted into the future for alleged "serious misconduct" in unemployment. That teachers of the said interpretation of the Basel Personnel Act does not simply accept this, will, of course by itself Unfortunately, the federal court under federal judges origin, Niquille federal judge, federal judges and clerks Maillard Lanz By order of 3 August 2010 the Board of Teacher H. dismissed. Because of this decision appointing authorities to immediately transfer the right of employees to a psychiatric examination required, if they have a own opinions represented. Those who defend against such a transfer must reckon with his dismissal for alleged "serious misconduct". Although in no personal law of Switzerland, noted that legislation like this, but federal judges may interpret the laws known as it suits them.

The long history of suffering from H. teacher provides an interesting insight into the Swiss Machtfilz. The prosecutors and some judges of the Criminal Court, the Administrative Court and the Federal Court to make a more than dubious impression. A prosecutor and a judiciary that follows people uncomfortable going against massive illegal is a serious threat to the rule of law. The judicial system protects the officers apparently in Switzerland and Behördenfilz in an unconstitutional manner. In view of these facts, it must be assumed that the so-called separation of powers in the canton of Basel-City and in Switzerland only exists on paper. Nazi methods have no place in a constitutional state anything!

0 comments:

Post a Comment