According to § 152 of the Criminal Procedure Code Klagpartei is invited witnesses and other evidence in time to provide the President or the President himself, or bring to trial.
knows Obviously, the new entrants to the criminal court Basel active lic. iur. Marc Oser (SVP) § 152 no. Only then can it be explained that the inexperienced Oser in the hearing on 17.3.10 of lic. iur. Barbara Pfister obvious dupe left. Had in dealing with legal twists experienced lawyer the job taken to twist the obvious defamation of the former Rector Gaby OS-Jeno in so-called "legitimate interests". Shortly after commencement of the trial claimed Pfister:
"To my knowledge, there is a list of evidence. These witnesses are not mentioned. I request not to listen to these witnesses, as we have the right to be notified in advance. "
Had Criminal Court President lic. iur. Marc Oser been sufficiently competent, he would have rejected the request of the lawyer.
Even applicants H. made the Chief Justice pointed out that the subpoena is expressly that witnesses and evidence itself can be brought to trial.
had Subsequently lic. iur. Marc Oser all documents that the criminal acts of Gaby Jeno documented from arbitrary. The two witnesses, which teachers themselves H. brought to trial could not be questioned unlawful.
with his incompetent posturing, turned out to be the new capital punishment President lic. iur. Marc Oser as a master of the arbitrary assessment of evidence and the incorrect application of law.
Already at the beginning of the trial showed the completely inexperienced president of the court to be totally biased. The background was "unfortunate run," "it always need two, "there were" misunderstandings "and given no proof application" light up the offense. "
who behaves as a judge at the beginning of a negotiation so implausible, should prefer to remain a clerk!
0 comments:
Post a Comment