Who wants to act as lawyer for the defendant for libel former Rector OS Gaby Jeno, must be able to twist the truth to be ruthless to rotten. Lawyer lic. iur. Barbara Pfister is not only a lawyer, but also managing director of the union employees Basel, Managing Director the association of employee druggists and chemists, Managing Director Bank Employees Association North West Switzerland and member of the Tripartite Commission Basel-Stadt.
Early in the trial of their client by Gaby Jeno tricked the clever lawyer, the totally inexperienced not popularly elected chief justice lic. iur. Marc Oser cunning of:
"To my knowledge, there is a list of evidence. These witnesses are not mentioned. . I request not to listen to these witnesses, as we have the right to be notified in advance "
is correct: H. teachers can his witnesses as a surprise coup to take to trial. That the judge rejects the request is not illegal, is a bad procedural errors.
also put in their plea lic. Barbara Pfister iur not go back, to say things that are found in the respective files anywhere. Here are some examples:
"said H. teacher realized he compare himself with the situation and saw itself as a victim of a conspiracy."
The truth is that teachers as a dedicated teacher H. has the issue of bullying at his school central theme. In a teaching session, he called his new Rector Gaby Jeno even in cases of bullying are finally active. The headmistress picked up the ball and bullying the teacher uncomfortable military precision of their school.
. "The context in which the name was Tschanun is not relevant"
is right: Teachers H. wanted to get help with his colleague Claudia Gass and the inspection president Peter Gross, because he bullied from Gaby Jenö felt.
. "The defendant then went to the police because they felt the situation as threatening"
Correction: Gaby Jeno is responsible for the situation. With its various letters she has slandered the good teachers systematically as potential perpetrators of violence. Their pathological sense of threats abuse them to teachers to assume a H. offense.
. "They had the intention to protect the plaintiff and the environment from escalations"
is right: By completely disproportionate and illegal action by the Rector, the escalation possible. The environment of H. teacher was frightened by the incompetent actions by Gaby Jeno completely unnecessary.
"It's just that the defendant told the prosecution that he had expressed to a third party, he feels like Tschanun."
is correct: Neither Claudia Gass nor Peter Gross have argued that teachers have felt like H. Tschanun. This assertion has deliberately set Gaby Jenö in the world to denounce the righteous without notice to teacher.
. "It is not a dismissal or action barracuda"
is true: The aim of Jeno Gaby from the beginning was the dismissal of the teacher. Since because there were no grounds for termination must be provoked an escalation of events.
. "It's not about suicide threats or the existing party report"
is Right: A Rector suicide threats imputed to their employees, massively abused their office. Self and Foreign threat is from desk perpetrators always taken into consideration if you want to lock away people uncomfortable forced psychiatric.
. "The defendant merely repeated what the plaintiff said already by itself against third parties"
is Correct: The defendant is accused teachers to have H. ejected repeatedly threatened. In saying that teachers feel like H. Tschanun, it makes the teacher intentionally potential for running amok.
. "He did not deny having made the comparison himself"
is correct: H. teachers has never been compared with the gunman Tschanun, but in conversation passing, to Claudia Gass and Peter Gross mentioned the name of the victimized Tschanun.
"The defendant was accused not of dishonorable behavior."
It is true that defendant accused the teacher of criminal offenses committed, and they have threatened with death.
. "It is documented that the plaintiff brought the comparison and compared himself to Tschanun"
is correct: Only Gaby Jeno and the investigators speak of "comparison". Gass, H. Gross and teachers used the term before.
"They acted with legitimate interests to protect students Teachers and school management as well as true to his own protection "
's. Gabi Jeno led to an escalation of their pathological interpretations, which the entire environment of teachers completely unnecessary H. frightened. They risked their totally arbitrary charges a disproportionate escalation of the situation.
. He torpedoed any help and there were indications of a potential threat "
is correct: H. teachers sought with all parties time and again the conversation, but was taken seriously by anybody. Regierungsrat H. Eymann teacher refused to this day the call. Indicators of a potential threat was invented to free the perpetrators of bullying whim. H. teachers always remained cool and was abolished by the malicious behavior of his opponents never provoke.
. "The statements to the police do not go beyond what is necessary"
is right: To date, the Gaby Jeno alleged in their complaint "Drohmails" not shown up. Also by Gaby Jeno claimed inspection member who allegedly feared, teacher H. "balls" around time in the school until the present day be found. The entire lawsuit was completely unnecessary, except Gaby Jeno teacher would intentionally H. do harm.
. It pursued legitimate interests that they had reasons to keep true to the allegations in good reasons "
is right:" bullying "in" legitimate interests "to twist, is shameful. A lawyer who turned systematically pecuniary reasons, the truth makes himself credible as a director of several associations and organizations.
. Tschanun Who brings into play may not be surprised by the respective associations "
is correct: Tschanun is a cause of bullying victims. In order to successfully bullying do need help it fight people bullying. Who Tschanun quiet about the case, prevented the fight against bullying.
0 comments:
Post a Comment