Saturday, March 27, 2010

Herpes Simplex Virus 2 Vaccine 2010

teachers - Authorities bullying victims


Since 1984, H. was employed as a teacher's employer Basel-Stadt. Of this, he taught about 10 years Brunnmatt at the school orientation. H. 2005 was given to Gaby Jenö a new boss, who was also a teacher and school leader at the OS Brunnmatt and H. teachers had over the years numerous disagreements. Within a year, took all the new Rector to urge teachers cent of the teaching profession. It used the unclear formulated articles of the new Personnel Act and constructed from a spiral of escalation intent to drive H. teachers with intent to unemployment. Your sneaky approach can only be described as "bullying" or "Bossing". Unfortunately, the chase of Teachers H. from the current Head of Education Hans-Georg Signer (SP), the head of the Department of Education Dr. Christoph Eymann (LDP and the Court President of the Court of Appeal and the Administrative Court, Dr. Marie-Louise Master (LDP) was vigorously supported.
starting point for the witch hunt against teachers were three H. completely groundless complaints of three left-feminist mothers. These complaints took Jeno RELIED excuse to H. about the medical officer to engage in a psychiatric procedure. Even in the summer 2006 she placed freely H., on the grounds that he had a mental illness and was a danger to himself and his environment. The personnel manager schools Baerlocher Thomas urged the guardianship authority of the municipality of H. even to have to against a teacher in a so-called custodial care Homer (FFE). As H. found out, he was so shocked that he was writing to the medical officer logged off. Then asked the medical officer Dr. Marc Meier at the urging of Jeno, Baerlocher and Eymann of the cantonal guardianship authority BL the disposal of a FFE. The H. was at home visiting emergency but not a psychiatrist FFE have, because H. despite incredible provocation was always correct and courteous. Shortly after the interview was H. unexpectedly attacked by the special unit of the Kapo BL "Barracuda" and ended up in remand prison Waaghof Basel, where he was locked in a monitoring cell 24 hours. Jeno H. had the day before the public prosecutor appears illegal, claiming that H. had sent Drohmails and Günter Tschanun compared. This infamous lie was supported later by the SHL Brunnmatt and the Head of the School Psychological Service, Dr. Peter Gutzwiller two ordered letters. The fact is that H. intent of all parties always provoked and was ignored and that certain state officials maliciously a climate of fear generated by H. unlawfully removed with precautionary measures from the hospital. The escalation cascade that H. was forced during his summer vacation in 2006 was, apparently as a "self-fulfilling prophecy" has been planned. This did not, however, since S. snaps never and always acted correctly. The warnings from H. to school management and school management to file a claim and to publish the entire history of bullying, H. brought up a defamatory article in the two local newspapers. As "threatened teachers authorities" in the text titled Baslerstab and because as a "teacher Threats exempt "put up BaZ article featured H. unlawfully in reputational way related to the pillory. Shortly H. received from the Dean of the dismissal on the grounds that he had a" committed serious misconduct "because he appointment with the medical officer have not noticed. The letters of many parents, the H. estimated as a committed and competent teachers were very, of the school management, Jeno Rector, head of Signer and ED chief Eymann intentionally ignored consistently. With his attorney, Dr. Rolf Jucker H. presented at the Personnel Appeals Board (PRK) an appeal against his dismissal, but without success. PRK, chaired by Gabrielle Kremo followed the reasoning the ED in all respects. That H. in the class in which he was the class teacher, had a very good relationship with all children and parents interested in the PRK in the slightest. Two complaints were written by H. and Eymann abgeschmettert of Signer on all points. The private action for defamation, the H had brought against his boss, was prejudiced by the court president lic. iur. Marc Oser abgeschmettert arbitrary. The judge twisted the facts and claimed that teachers had compared with H. Günther Tschanun. That in fact has made this comparison with Gaby Jeno their criminal complaint for alleged threat, the Basel criminal court covered up by all means. All the evidence, witnesses and issues Gaby Jeno had a massive impact, were Chief Justice of lic. iur. Marc Oser denied intentionally. The highlight of the trial was conducted entirely at random, the victims of bullying teachers H. prejudiced by the court president to assume the legal fees of the other party in the amount of CHF 8685.50 convicted. It is unbelievable that in this "legal system" that has severely injured in his honor victims of bullying at the end and still pay all the costs.

By order of the criminal proceedings against H. 23/03/2007, for alleged threat by the prosecutor of Basel-City has been set. As compensation for the incredible stress was silly H. Fri 1200th - the state as compensation. After all, the prosecution noted that teachers had been violated H. heavily in his personality:

"In the present case, however, can not be overlooked that due to the media interest in your" case "in perhaps a greater extent in their personal circumstances been affected than others, which are otherwise involved with no result in a prosecution. In addition, also provide the circumstances of your detention, and certainly in related rumors in your neighborhood a drastic effect on your mental integrity dar. therefore appears the alignment of an additional satisfaction because the specific initial position as justified. "

Signer and Eymann asked the parents, the" bullying allegations "by H. teachers not to believe. The numerous false statements by Dr. Christoph Eymann and his supposedly" troubled "telephone call with the director of health services Dr. Andreas Faller suggest that the dismissal of the teacher H. has been planned by the top. The inspection of the OS has done in the two years prior to the dismissal of a single teacher H. hours visit. Also a performance appraisal (MAG) with H. teachers never took place. Nevertheless, President Peter Gross inspection of both the exemption and the notice available grants, contact without H. advance. Obviously, through the OS no longer members of the inspection visits to schools, but parents selectively unprofessional female speakers, whose denunciations of the SHL and the SL and without filters are taken "seriously". This makes it possible to fill the personnel file of unpopular teachers with negative material without the SHL, the SL or inspection should carry out hours. Competent and committed teachers that do not show "uncritical subservient mentality" to be driven by all means to "burn out" or the "dismissal". Those who still have sufficient resources and has dared to express their criticism of the system will take the precaution § 25 of the Personnel Act free. In its ruling of 18:12:07, the administrative court has ruled that the termination was possessed by the OS Rectorate unlawful. Nevertheless, the teacher could not continue working. With three other threats H. termination was forced by his boss Gary Jeno, to be examined by the IV-expert Dr. Daniel Fasnacht. In addition alleged Jeno seriously, that of H. allegedly placed on the internet facts are defamatory to the employer Basel-Stadt. The opposite is the case. The criminal actions of the various state officials to damage the reputation of the canton of Basel-Stadt! Bullying can be tolerated in the cantonal administration, under any circumstances! The study has Ulich clearly shown that one third of the Basel teachers burn out and is at risk from the manager "not taken seriously" feel. The body set up by Dr. Christoph Eymann 'counseling center for teachers "does not alter this fact. The concerns and needs of teachers at all interested in the education bureaucrats, not in reality. Who does not spurt is being bullied, with psychologists and psychiatrists from the system. H. What has experienced in recent years is absolutely incredible. The practice of Rector Gaby Jeno and personnel manager Thomas Baerlocher have violated the personal integrity of teachers and H. massively traumatized. The way in which Head Hans Georg Signer and Department Head Dr. Christoph Eymann manipulate language by teachers and parents intentionally and the head of school psychological services, Dr. Peter Gutzwiller has intentionally abused the trust of coach as so-called H, is completely unacceptable. The permanent provocation designed spiral of escalation, should have been transformed by H. FFE in a mentally ill patient. The teachers have during his vacation H. imposed psychiatrization, criminalization and subsequent scandal in the Basler Zeitung H. driven into unemployment and to the edge of his existence. H. teachers, both when the GPK, the ombudsman, and in the counseling service asked for help. Support was extremely modest. January Goepfert referred by the GPK H. teachers to the ombudsman. Beatrice Ingle-Buomberger did not even know of the ombudsman's office that the cancellation of a medical examination as a "grave breach" an Event of Default is and Corinne Panchaud of the counseling service, by teacher H. Although about two-hour phone conversation, was surprisingly the concluded that the fraudulent actions of OS Rector Gaby Jeno was no bullying. Also, the first prosecutor Thomas Hug saw no evidence of crimes of abuse, coercion, false accusation, misrepresentation or defamation of justice. After all, the Administrative Court in its ruling of 18:12:07 clearly stated:

"In summary, that the notice has been wrongly, the appeal must therefore approve of and the decision of the Personnel Appeals Board is repealed, the method is according to § 40 para 4 PG for free.. the outcome of the trial is to be determined according to the recurrent one party compensation to align. "

Unfortunately the verdict of the Administrative Court also not beyond doubt. In the ten-page letter, the court glossed over under the chairmanship of Dr. Marie-Louise stem the intriguing action of Rector Gaby Jenö as "defects of shape". Teachers would not H. filed within 10 days appeal against unlawful dismissal, he would be forever rid of his job. The Administrative Court will recognize these clear facts, despite no evidence of bullying.

has meanwhile denounced the rector Gaby Jeno respectable teacher again. This time it should be a "serious breach" that the perfectly healthy and able-bodied do not have of H. IV-psychiatrist Dr. Daniel Fasnacht can evaluate. Of course, H. appeals against the second dismissal. Once again, this time the Personnel Appeals Board was chaired by Dr. Christoph Meyer in all aspects of the legal representative of the Department of Education. The Appeals Chamber of the Basel Criminal Court under the chairmanship of lic. iur. Liselotte Henz wanted to recognize the fraudulent events of the various state officials no criminal acts. Unfortunately, there is now also on 15.10.09, the Administrative Court under the chairmanship of Dr. Marie-Louise master of the absurd argument of the appointing authority and the Personnel Appeals Board connected. Although teachers let H. investigate medical office on the instructions of the appointing authority, even by the Basel FFE specialist Dr. Eric Odenheim, and could see no signs of this disease, asked Gaby Jenö a psychiatric assessment at additional IV-psychiatrist Dr. Daniel Fasnacht. As the teacher, this new assault would not have fallen, He was a second time for alleged "serious breach" fired.

Administrative Court President Dr. Marie-Louise Master (LDP), which had mustered in the first trial three police officers searching the complete integrity teacher in vain for weapons involved, the second trial again policemen who explicitly had orders to transfer the teacher If this at all if the verdict "disengage" would. Obviously, the Administrative Court president knew in advance that its decision in H. teachers would not meet with enthusiasm. Although H. teachers had undergone quite correctly dictated the illegal medical examination, supported the administrative court to re unfair dismissal. It seems that Dr. Marie-Louise master their comrades Dr. Christoph Eymann did not want to fall in the back as she announced that the completely healthy H. teachers with the denial of the psychiatric assessment IV alleged a "serious breach of duty" have been involved in should. This highly questionable interpretation of the Basel Personnel Act, the Administrative Court, the transfer of competence of the appointing authority in a wholly unacceptable scale has expanded massively. Because of this indefensible decision, the appointing authority now has the authority to exempt employees without notice uncomfortable and forced into a psychiatric assessment from action. Each non-employee on sick leave, that takes its basic constitutional positions and refusing to transfer to compulsory psychiatric assessment is catapulted into the future for alleged "serious misconduct" in unemployment. That teachers of the said interpretation of the Basel Personnel Act does not simply accept this, will, of course by itself Unfortunately, the federal court under federal judges origin, Niquille federal judge, federal judges and clerks Maillard Lanz By order of 3 August 2010 the Board of Teacher H. dismissed. Because of this decision appointing authorities to immediately transfer the right of employees to a psychiatric examination required, if they have a own opinions represented. Those who defend against such a transfer must reckon with his dismissal for alleged "serious misconduct". Although in no personal law of Switzerland, noted that legislation like this, but federal judges may interpret the laws known as it suits them.

The long history of suffering from H. teacher provides an interesting insight into the Swiss Machtfilz. The prosecutors and some judges of the Criminal Court, the Administrative Court and the Federal Court to make a more than dubious impression. A prosecutor and a judiciary that follows people uncomfortable going against massive illegal is a serious threat to the rule of law. The judicial system protects the officers apparently in Switzerland and Behördenfilz in an unconstitutional manner. In view of these facts, it must be assumed that the so-called separation of powers in the canton of Basel-City and in Switzerland only exists on paper. Nazi methods have no place in a constitutional state anything!

Monday, March 22, 2010

Head Muscle Spasms Anxiety

chocolates, lottery play, job search




By Michael Helbling

"Life is like a box of chocolates -. You never know what you get" Forrest Gump Tom Hanks alias taught us in 1994, as can be profound truisms. Like to be like us saying that this or that is in the life of a lottery: the choice of the fastest checkout on Saturday afternoon before closing time, the perfect gift for the treasury at home, the prospects of the Swiss national team at the World Cup in South Africa - and a successful job search in times of crisis. Am I wrong, or I just hear a 172-999-fold nod? 172 999 can not be wrong, and behind closed doors, many HR managers should nodding a bit. Who will blame him? Finally, the poor fellow must often dig through hundreds of files. The fact that at a first selected King accident his finger in the game, of course by itself is not surprising, many job seekers fatalistic and trust their luck now and then to the Lottofee. Could be that it works and it has safe hands for all time. Holiday book instead of looking for bodies, so to speak. But reality brings a quicker, than one would like. For he who wants to look on the Internet, has finally worked out and obs www.lotto.ch typing in the address bar, lands a job search engine, a platform for job seekers. Sometimes the Internet is like a box of chocolates.

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Trouble Breathing Pain In Right Arm

Barbara Pfister - Attorney


Who wants to act as lawyer for the defendant for libel former Rector OS Gaby Jeno, must be able to twist the truth to be ruthless to rotten. Lawyer lic. iur. Barbara Pfister is not only a lawyer, but also managing director of the union employees Basel, Managing Director the association of employee druggists and chemists, Managing Director Bank Employees Association North West Switzerland and member of the Tripartite Commission Basel-Stadt.

Early in the trial of their client by Gaby Jeno tricked the clever lawyer, the totally inexperienced not popularly elected chief justice lic. iur. Marc Oser cunning of:

"To my knowledge, there is a list of evidence. These witnesses are not mentioned. . I request not to listen to these witnesses, as we have the right to be notified in advance "

is correct: H. teachers can his witnesses as a surprise coup to take to trial. That the judge rejects the request is not illegal, is a bad procedural errors.

also put in their plea lic. Barbara Pfister iur not go back, to say things that are found in the respective files anywhere. Here are some examples:

"said H. teacher realized he compare himself with the situation and saw itself as a victim of a conspiracy."

The truth is that teachers as a dedicated teacher H. has the issue of bullying at his school central theme. In a teaching session, he called his new Rector Gaby Jeno even in cases of bullying are finally active. The headmistress picked up the ball and bullying the teacher uncomfortable military precision of their school.

. "The context in which the name was Tschanun is not relevant"

is right: Teachers H. wanted to get help with his colleague Claudia Gass and the inspection president Peter Gross, because he bullied from Gaby Jenö felt.

. "The defendant then went to the police because they felt the situation as threatening"

Correction: Gaby Jeno is responsible for the situation. With its various letters she has slandered the good teachers systematically as potential perpetrators of violence. Their pathological sense of threats abuse them to teachers to assume a H. offense.

. "They had the intention to protect the plaintiff and the environment from escalations"

is right: By completely disproportionate and illegal action by the Rector, the escalation possible. The environment of H. teacher was frightened by the incompetent actions by Gaby Jeno completely unnecessary.

"It's just that the defendant told the prosecution that he had expressed to a third party, he feels like Tschanun."

is correct: Neither Claudia Gass nor Peter Gross have argued that teachers have felt like H. Tschanun. This assertion has deliberately set Gaby Jenö in the world to denounce the righteous without notice to teacher.

. "It is not a dismissal or action barracuda"

is true: The aim of Jeno Gaby from the beginning was the dismissal of the teacher. Since because there were no grounds for termination must be provoked an escalation of events.

. "It's not about suicide threats or the existing party report"

is Right: A Rector suicide threats imputed to their employees, massively abused their office. Self and Foreign threat is from desk perpetrators always taken into consideration if you want to lock away people uncomfortable forced psychiatric.

. "The defendant merely repeated what the plaintiff said already by itself against third parties"

is Correct: The defendant is accused teachers to have H. ejected repeatedly threatened. In saying that teachers feel like H. Tschanun, it makes the teacher intentionally potential for running amok.

. "He did not deny having made the comparison himself"

is correct: H. teachers has never been compared with the gunman Tschanun, but in conversation passing, to Claudia Gass and Peter Gross mentioned the name of the victimized Tschanun.

"The defendant was accused not of dishonorable behavior."

It is true that defendant accused the teacher of criminal offenses committed, and they have threatened with death.

. "It is documented that the plaintiff brought the comparison and compared himself to Tschanun"

is correct: Only Gaby Jeno and the investigators speak of "comparison". Gass, H. Gross and teachers used the term before.

"They acted with legitimate interests to protect students Teachers and school management as well as true to his own protection "

's. Gabi Jeno led to an escalation of their pathological interpretations, which the entire environment of teachers completely unnecessary H. frightened. They risked their totally arbitrary charges a disproportionate escalation of the situation.

. He torpedoed any help and there were indications of a potential threat "

is correct: H. teachers sought with all parties time and again the conversation, but was taken seriously by anybody. Regierungsrat H. Eymann teacher refused to this day the call. Indicators of a potential threat was invented to free the perpetrators of bullying whim. H. teachers always remained cool and was abolished by the malicious behavior of his opponents never provoke.

. "The statements to the police do not go beyond what is necessary"

is right: To date, the Gaby Jeno alleged in their complaint "Drohmails" not shown up. Also by Gaby Jeno claimed inspection member who allegedly feared, teacher H. "balls" around time in the school until the present day be found. The entire lawsuit was completely unnecessary, except Gaby Jeno teacher would intentionally H. do harm.

. It pursued legitimate interests that they had reasons to keep true to the allegations in good reasons "

is right:" bullying "in" legitimate interests "to twist, is shameful. A lawyer who turned systematically pecuniary reasons, the truth makes himself credible as a director of several associations and organizations.

. Tschanun Who brings into play may not be surprised by the respective associations "

is correct: Tschanun is a cause of bullying victims. In order to successfully bullying do need help it fight people bullying. Who Tschanun quiet about the case, prevented the fight against bullying.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Can I Get Feline Hepatitis

lic. iur. Marc Oser - Court President

According to § 152 of the Criminal Procedure Code Klagpartei is invited witnesses and other evidence in time to provide the President or the President himself, or bring to trial.

knows Obviously, the new entrants to the criminal court Basel active lic. iur. Marc Oser (SVP) § 152 no. Only then can it be explained that the inexperienced Oser in the hearing on 17.3.10 of lic. iur. Barbara Pfister obvious dupe left. Had in dealing with legal twists experienced lawyer the job taken to twist the obvious defamation of the former Rector Gaby OS-Jeno in so-called "legitimate interests". Shortly after commencement of the trial claimed Pfister:

"To my knowledge, there is a list of evidence. These witnesses are not mentioned. I request not to listen to these witnesses, as we have the right to be notified in advance. "

Had Criminal Court President lic. iur. Marc Oser been sufficiently competent, he would have rejected the request of the lawyer.

Even applicants H. made the Chief Justice pointed out that the subpoena is expressly that witnesses and evidence itself can be brought to trial.

had Subsequently lic. iur. Marc Oser all documents that the criminal acts of Gaby Jeno documented from arbitrary. The two witnesses, which teachers themselves H. brought to trial could not be questioned unlawful.

with his incompetent posturing, turned out to be the new capital punishment President lic. iur. Marc Oser as a master of the arbitrary assessment of evidence and the incorrect application of law.

Already at the beginning of the trial showed the completely inexperienced president of the court to be totally biased. The background was "unfortunate run," "it always need two, "there were" misunderstandings "and given no proof application" light up the offense. "

who behaves as a judge at the beginning of a negotiation so implausible, should prefer to remain a clerk!