teacher H. lodges a complaint against the Appeal Court ruling of 2 August 2010. The decision of the Court of Appeal should be set aside and dismiss the appeal. The defendant should be ordered because Gaby Jeno several libel and defamation. All costs should be borne by the defendant.
Justification: The Court of Appeals has clarified determined that it is a libel to call an honest man as a potential suicide and potential madman and to place him, he felt like "Tschanun. However, the court said that those comments were made in 'preserving public interests "and" reasonable cause ". With this protection claim, the Basel Appeal to the offenses covered up by Gaby Jeno systematically. It is in the file clearly states that the defendant the plaintiff had already been placed under suicide intentions and Amokabsichten before the applicant could submit its comments on the case Tschanun. (Letter of 06/07/2006) It's really not about the "protection of public interests," but rather the systematic discrediting of the plaintiff. There was also never a "reasonable cause" to show the plaintiff for alleged threat to him and an emergency psychiatrist and a task force on the neck rush. The whole disgusting threat scenario is a malicious lie construct that was intentionally set by Gaby Jeno systematically in the world in order to harm the plaintiff to dismiss him and massively illegal.
evidence: Both lower courts have ignored the evidence and witnesses of the plaintiff intentionally and constructed an alleged exculpatory evidence that, in assessing of the facts is completely untenable. Fact:
first It is on record that the plaintiff has accused Jeno Gaby in their lawsuit to have written Drohmails. However, it is shown that this Drohmails definitely do not exist. (Charge sheet dated 11.8.2006)
second It is on record that the applicant has never compared Tschanun, but on the contrary has always clearly distanced from the action.
third It is on record that the applicant has never been struck violently in his life and is described in a letter even parents to be extremely popular and dedicated teacher.
4th It is on record that Gaby Jeno claimed as the only, the applicant had Tschanun felt like. Neither Claudia Gass nor Peter Gross, that the plaintiff had actually spoken about the case Tschanun, this rumor was brought into the world. (See document)
5th It is on record that Gaby Jeno had in the summer holidays in 2006 never asked about the mood of the plaintiff. If she had actually acted in "defense of public interests" and "reasonable cause", they would have as head of the applicant that at least can contact them by telephone to verify their massive charges. Obviously, however, was never even the best interests of the plaintiff in the foreground, but the intention of this fraudulently as a dangerous offender to systematically discredit.
6th It is on record that the applicant has lost his job because he Gaby Jeno fraudulently as alleged mentally ill violent offenders has been slandered. That there is a "serious breach of duty" should be, not to be dictated by a state psychiatrist examine is nowhere mentioned in the Basel Personnel Act.
7th It is on record that school psychologist Peter Gutzwiller classifies the plaintiff only as a public danger, after all this escalation is already behind him and had been released from custody was. There is not a single letter, which shows that the fraudulent action Gaby Jenö in "reasonable responsibility" is done. Gutzwiller his letter that only later wrote, proves that it previously had no reason to impute to the applicant a self or foreign threat. (Letter of 17:10:06) This is by Gutzwiller optional cover letter written by Gaby Jeno obviously the criminal acts of Gaby Jeno later.
8th It is on record that the plaintiff about everything and loves his job so now for the third time the legal process is heading to federal court. From a self-and other hazards can obviously be no question. Those who consistently strikes the courts may not as a suicide still be described as running amok. Since the applicant had taken already in his unlawful waiver of court, the defamatory statements made by Gaby Jeno were not made in "reasonable cause", but served only to discredit the plaintiff, massive, it intentionally to violate his honor and to systematically to harm.
9th It is on record that all state institutions, the psychiatric reports of Dr. Piet Westdijk systematically ignored. The report demonstrates clearly that the plaintiff had never previously been chipped or mentally incapacitated.
10th It is on record that Gaby Jenö repeatedly claimed the systematic falsehood. Even in the trial, they denied the defendant that they had caused to the plaintiff to seek psychiatric survey. (Negotiation protocol, p. 8).
11th It is on record that has never apologized Gaby Jenö the plaintiff for their malicious and disproportionate action.
From the above it is clear that Gaby Jeno has not acted in "defense of public interests" and "reasonable cause", but it has intentionally has everything to harm the plaintiff intentionally and to bully him out of his beloved profession. That Court President Dr. Marie-Louise tribe, which had already been approved the fraudulent notice, now also dealt with the criminal proceedings against the head of the plaintiff is also not legally tenable. Obviously, this massively biased judge and should have come into the strike. For this reason, the Court of Appeal is set aside and dismiss the appeal.
The Gutglaubensbeweis the defendant under these circumstances can not be provided. The defendant acted without "reasonable cause", particularly without the "protection of public interests," and mainly with the intention to accuse the plaintiff harm. For this reason, the Judgement of the Court of Appeal set aside and dismiss the appeal. The defendant is ordered to legally claim of multiple defamation and libel. Since the defendant has caused with its devious criminal complaint against the applicant to pay all costs, they should also take on all the costs.
0 comments:
Post a Comment